Court of Appeals dismisses 24 admin cases against CDO mayor

Jun. 21, 2019

CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY, Philippines — The Court of Appeals’ 12th division has dismissed 24 administrative cases against incumbent mayor Oscar Moreno, a city government official said Friday.

City information officer Maricel Rivera has confirmed that the CA has junked the 24 cases in relation to the rental of heavy equipment when Moreno was still the governor of Misamis Oriental.

The 33-page decision was signed by Associate Justices Victoria Isabel Paredes, Marlene Gonzales-Sison, and Maria Elisa Sempio Diy on May 15, 2019, but city hall released the information on Friday, June 21.

Also cleared by the appellate court were former provincial bids and awards committee members Elsie Lopoy, Rolando Pacuribot, Elmer Wabe, Leemar Tinagan, Divina Bade, and Patrick Gabutina.

All of them were charged before the Office of the Ombudsman for serious dishonesty, grave misconduct and conduct prejudicial to the best interest of public service.

The Ombudsman alleged that the rental of the heavy equipment for the road development project did not follow the bidding process, although the respondents reasoned that they resorted to other forms of procurement.

In their decision, the CA associate justices said, “the existence of conspiracy cannot be presumed, it must be proven through clear and convincing evidence,” adding that the acts of the respondents did not, in any way, tarnish the image and integrity of their respective office and this, they cannot be found guilty of the offense.

The CA has also approved the respondents’ petition for certiorari, or an order by which a higher court reviews the decision of a lower court.

“The Petition for Certiorari and prohibition are hereby GRANTED and the assailed Decision issue by the office of the Ombudsman on various dates finding petitioners guilty of serious dishonesty, grave misconduct, and conduct prejudicial to the best interest of service are REVERSED and SET ASIDE. Accordingly, the Administrative complaints against them are DISMISSED,” reads a part of the CA decision. (

comments powered by Disqus